
| Anonymous | Login | 2025-12-13 17:42 EST | ![]() |
| Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap |
| View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | |||||||
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update | |||
| 0000999 | PacketFence | error-handling | public | 2010-05-31 12:43 | 2012-10-19 15:05 | |||
| Reporter | obilodeau | |||||||
| Assigned To | ||||||||
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried | |||
| Status | resolved | Resolution | fixed | |||||
| Platform | OS | OS Version | ||||||
| Product Version | ||||||||
| Target Version | Fixed in Version | |||||||
| Summary | 0000999: routed-mode: dhcpd doesn't start complaining about no listen interfaces | |||||||
| Description | I tried several different things and it's still not working so I am opening a bug so we can give a better error message when this condition is reached. In pf::util under get_dhcp_devs() when we are about to return an empty list, we should give some diagnostic about how to fix such a situation. | |||||||
| Tags | usability | |||||||
| fixed in git revision | ||||||||
| fixed in mtn revision | ||||||||
| Attached Files | ||||||||
Notes |
|
|
(0001570) obilodeau (reporter) 2010-05-31 13:08 |
Ok, here's the deal: I was trying to do dhcp without a local subnet (only through IP-Helpers) after a bit of googling I found out that dhcpd doesn't like that so I added a new local scope even though I have no plans to use it. Maybe when we generate the config, if we see that no local dhcp subnet is defined we should die saying you need at least a local one. Btw, my above hint about "get_dhcp_devs()" is false. |
|
(0001586) obilodeau (reporter) 2010-06-30 14:51 |
The admin guide recommends running local VLANs which should prevent the experience of this problem. Because of that, I re-target for 1.9.1. |
|
(0001727) obilodeau (reporter) 2010-10-20 10:39 |
changing conf/templates/dhcpd_vlan.conf to:
authoritative;
ddns-update-style none;
ignore client-updates;
local-address 10.10.0.10;
subnet 10.10.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
}
does the trick for now but this should work out of the box. |
|
(0003209) fgaudreault (viewer) 2012-10-19 15:05 |
Fixed recently. |
Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 2010-05-31 12:43 | obilodeau | New Issue | |
| 2010-05-31 12:43 | obilodeau | Status | new => assigned |
| 2010-05-31 12:43 | obilodeau | Assigned To | => rbalzard |
| 2010-05-31 13:08 | obilodeau | Note Added: 0001570 | |
| 2010-06-30 14:51 | obilodeau | Note Added: 0001586 | |
| 2010-06-30 14:51 | obilodeau | Target Version | 1.9.0 => 1.9.1 |
| 2010-09-15 13:25 | obilodeau | Tag Attached: usability | |
| 2010-09-15 13:25 | obilodeau | Target Version | 1.9.1 => 1.9.2 |
| 2010-09-22 16:02 | obilodeau | Target Version | 1.9.2 => 1.9.3 |
| 2010-10-20 10:39 | obilodeau | Note Added: 0001727 | |
| 2012-10-19 15:05 | fgaudreault | Note Added: 0003209 | |
| 2012-10-19 15:05 | fgaudreault | Status | assigned => resolved |
| 2012-10-19 15:05 | fgaudreault | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2012-10-19 15:05 | fgaudreault | Assigned To | rbalzard => |
| 2012-10-19 15:05 | fgaudreault | Target Version | 1.9.3 => |
| Copyright © 2000 - 2012 MantisBT Group |