PacketFence - BTS - PacketFence
View Issue Details
IDProjectCategoryView StatusDate SubmittedLast Update
0001650PacketFencecaptive portalpublic2013-06-06 06:122013-06-07 23:34
Reporterrivan 
Assigned To 
PrioritynormalSeveritymajorReproducibilityalways
StatusfeedbackResolutionreopened 
PlatformOSOS Version
Product Version4.0.1 
Target VersionFixed in Version 
fixed in git revision
fixed in mtn revision
Summary0001650: Unable to Authenticate
DescriptionI've done the following
1. to create user
Configuration>create
username:guest10
password:guest10
2. add an authentication source
configuration>sources>add source>Htpasswd
name: guest
description:guest
file path:/usr/local/pf/conf/guest.conf
3. add a rule in newly created source (guest)
conditions: username starts guest
action
set access level: all
Steps To Reproduce
Additional Information
Tagsauthentication, captive portal
Relationships
Attached Files
Issue History
Date ModifiedUsernameFieldChange
2013-06-06 06:12rivanNew Issue
2013-06-06 06:12rivanTag Attached: captive portal
2013-06-06 06:12rivanTag Attached: authentication
2013-06-06 06:37ludovicNote Added: 0003320
2013-06-06 06:37ludovicStatusnew => closed
2013-06-06 06:37ludovicResolutionopen => won't fix
2013-06-06 08:06francisNote Added: 0003321
2013-06-06 21:36rivanNote Added: 0003322
2013-06-06 21:36rivanStatusclosed => feedback
2013-06-06 21:36rivanResolutionwon't fix => reopened
2013-06-06 22:37rivanNote Added: 0003323
2013-06-06 23:16rivanNote Edited: 0003322
2013-06-06 23:16rivanNote Deleted: 0003323
2013-06-07 23:34rivanNote Added: 0003324

Notes
(0003320)
ludovic   
2013-06-06 06:37   
"set access level" is wrong here, it's for the admin interface.

You MUST use "set role" AND "set unreg date"/"set access duration".
(0003321)
francis   
2013-06-06 08:06   
Steps 2 and 3 are not required.

From the "Users" page, edit your new user and set the actions to "set role" as Ludovic mentioned.
(0003322)
rivan   
2013-06-06 21:36   
(edited on: 2013-06-06 23:16)
that's the first thing that I did before I set it to all
sorry I didnt mention that.
I'm also running it as Inline Enforcement.
(0003324)
rivan   
2013-06-07 23:34   
The bug is just in Inline Enforcement.

Vlan Enforcement is good and running.