PacketFence - BTS - PacketFence |
| View Issue Details |
|
| ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
| 0001042 | PacketFence | core | public | 2010-07-28 13:03 | 2012-10-19 14:14 |
|
| Reporter | obilodeau | |
| Assigned To | | |
| Priority | normal | Severity | feature | Reproducibility | N/A |
| Status | resolved | Resolution | fixed | |
| Platform | | OS | | OS Version | |
| Product Version | 1.9.0 | |
| Target Version | | Fixed in Version | | |
| fixed in git revision | |
| fixed in mtn revision | |
|
| Summary | 0001042: autoreg in a category |
| Description | The violation action autoreg would need to be augmented the ability to assign a category.
One thing I could think of is to change the syntax to: autoreg(phone) so it would assign the phone category on autoregistration.
I don't know how you feel about this suggestion though, maybe it's an opportunity to rethink autoregistration like we said many times. |
| Steps To Reproduce | |
| Additional Information | |
| Tags | No tags attached. |
| Relationships | | related to | 0001026 | closed | obilodeau | PacketFence does not handle very well the AutoReg violation in some cases |
|
| Attached Files | |
|
| Issue History |
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| 2010-07-28 13:03 | obilodeau | New Issue | |
| 2010-07-28 13:03 | obilodeau | Status | new => assigned |
| 2010-07-28 13:03 | obilodeau | Assigned To | => obilodeau |
| 2010-07-28 13:04 | obilodeau | Relationship added | related to 0001026 |
| 2010-09-22 16:02 | obilodeau | Target Version | 1.9.2 => 1.9.3 |
| 2011-10-13 14:00 | obilodeau | Target Version | 1.9.3 => +2 |
| 2012-02-29 10:53 | obilodeau | Category | feature => core |
| 2012-10-19 14:14 | fgaudreault | Note Added: 0003187 | |
| 2012-10-19 14:14 | fgaudreault | Status | assigned => resolved |
| 2012-10-19 14:14 | fgaudreault | Resolution | open => fixed |
| 2012-10-19 14:14 | fgaudreault | Assigned To | obilodeau => |
| 2012-10-19 14:14 | fgaudreault | Target Version | long-term => |